Story 35: Zero Tolerance
The story: The email went to everyone. Company policy update: zero tolerance for sexual harassment. Then he made a comment about her legs. She told him it was not appropriate. He said she was overreacting. The policy existed. The email was sent. Nobody had ever discussed where the line sits, and he had put himself well inside it without checking.
What it means for organisations: This one is not two defensible readings. The comment landed as harassment whether or not he meant it that way, and her reading is the correct one. The gap is between a policy that names a standard and a workplace that never calibrated it. Zero tolerance is the strongest language a policy can use and says nothing about everyday behaviour, so the announcement gets made, nothing gets discussed, and the cost of that silence falls entirely on the person on the receiving end.
Where next?
Read the comic as text
The Alignment Gap, Story 35
by Stavros Stavru, Ph.D. (weallagreed.com)
Scene 1: The policy email
A close-up of a laptop on a desk, next to papers, a plant, a mug, a phone, and a pen. On screen is an email from HR@ahaplay.com to ALL@ahaplay.com, titled "Company Policy Update," reading: "Zero tolerance for sexual harassment." No one is present, and no one speaks.
Banner between scenes: “What could go wrong?”
Scene 2: The office kitchen
A kitchen with pendant lamps, a coffee machine, mugs on a shelf, and plants. Axel stands with one hand on his hip, gesturing dismissively. Ally faces him with both hands on her hips, firm and unamused.
Axel: You're overreacting!
Ally: No. Talking about my legs isn't appropriate!
Share this story: LinkedIn ↗
